Anyway, the title of the exhibition is precise: it’s all about the gods worshipped by the ancient Egyptians. As the press release boasts, the exhibition features more than five hundred objects – statues, figurines, reliefs, papyri, jewellery, sacrophagi, and so on – from the Antiquities Museum itself as well as other museums both domestic and foreign, including the British Museum, the Louvre, and the Egyptian Museum in Turin.
One of the things I like about recent temporary exhibitions, here but also elsewhere, is that they often pose a question right at the start that informs the exhibition as a whole. After walking through the doors of the temporary exhibition area, you’re immediately faced with a large wall featuring text that opens as follows:
Just one God suffices for Christians, Jews and Muslims. Yet the ancient Egyptians worshipped thousands of deities. How did their pantheon function and how did this [sic] develop?
The question posed isn’t a particularly challenging one, but it’ll do. The text underneath, printed in a smaller font size, explains that the ancient Egyptian pantheon “had a clear structure”, and that this structure “is the subject of this exhibition”. In principle, I like this: it immediately makes clear what the exhibition is about and what you can expect from it. Unfortunately, the exhibition turns out to be exactly what it says on the tin, meaning that it’s nothing more than the sum of its parts.
The exhibition kicks off with an area dedicated to Egyptian creation myths, with pride of place to Khnum, the ram’s headed creator god. This area also features the Shabaka Stone, an object from the British Museum that records the story of the creation of the city of Memphis. I like the fact that the exhibition explains that there were different stories in different parts of ancient Egypt: too often, cultures are treated as monolithic entities, with little regard for regional or diachronic variation.
A short animation plays here, as in other areas of the exhibition. It is projected unto the wall and gives a brief explanation relevant to this part of the exhibition; it’s playful and interesting, as well as very accessible. Personally, I never really have the patience to watch a video in a museum, but these are short and interesting enough to warrant attention.
The following rooms deal with the gods of the heavens (who were mostly female), the gods of the moon, the stars, and the Earth. The latter area also devotes space to what are referred to as the “gods on Earth”, the “pharaohs” (kings), as well as to Egyptian temples. The next area moves the deities to a more personal level as objects highlight the gods of the house and home, of whom the little god Bes is perhaps the best known.
Mummies and processions naturally lead to a space devoted to the gods of the netherworld. Objects here feature statues of Osiris and the jackal-headed god Anubis, a few mummy coffins, and examples of the Egyptian “Book of the Dead”. For those interested in the “darker” side of Egyptian mythology, there’s also ample text and objects dedicated to Apophis (Apep) and Set, i.e. the usual suspects.
Text with the heading “Eternal life” marks the end of ancient Egypt proper and serves as an introduction to the deities of Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt. A display case highlights the merging of cultures using two small figurines of the falcon-headed god Horus: one dates to the Late Period (ca. 772-332 BC, according to the description) and is typically Egyptian; the other dates to the first to second centuries AD, with the god depicted wearing Roman military dress. I find this a very effective way to demonstrate cultural change across time to a general audience.
The final area of the exhibition deals with Egyptomania and the seemingly unending interest in ancient Egypt, featuring, of course, a poster of the movie Gods of Egypt (2016), as well as comic books, modern Egyptianizing “art”, and so on. This part of the exhibition felt the least developed to me: a large (too large?) collection of disparate objects without much structure or point other than to illustrate that ancient Egypt is still something that draws interest. Of course it does: we wouldn’t be here otherwise, right?
There are plenty of interesting objects on display, but the exhibition in and of itself, for me at least, wasn’t particularly exciting. It’s not that it’s bad in any way. It feels, more than anything, workmanlike in how the topic has been approached. Maybe it’s because the subject matter is so well-known: when one thinks of ancient Egypt, aren’t the animal-headed gods, the stone temples and massive tombs, including the pyramids, among the very first things that enter one’s thoughts?
The structure promised at the beginning of the exhibition is delivered in full: we start at the beginning, with the Egyptian stories and gods related to the creation of the world. We follow the story until myth seemingly gives way to history, when we reach the Graeco-Roman world and then jump ahead to the nineteenth century and later.
Simply put: there are no surprises here. Compare it to a new performance of one of Shakespeare’s plays: you know exactly what to expect (if you’ve read the play or seen another performance of it), but you hope that a crafty director will throw in a surprise or two, or that a talented actor adds a fresh dimension to a familiar character. Sadly, nothing like that happens with this exhibition. It doesn’t challenge your ideas about ancient Egypt. It doesn’t push the envelope as much as it might – or as much as I would have liked.
It might seem that I’m terribly down on the exhibition, but it’s nevertheless worth a visit. If you’ve already amassed a wealth of knowledge on the subject, you might wander through it quickly, stopping only to look at the objects you’ve not seen before. If you’ve never really delved into the gods of Egypt, you’ll undoubtedly find a lot to like here, and you’ll learn plenty.
In short, Gods of Egypt may not be the most exciting exhibition on ancient Egypt, but it’s worth a visit for sure. Here’s hoping that the next large exhibition will be a bit more ambitious.